Comments on: Z-Bo for Michael Redd?

By: Paul Andre

Paul Andre — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:14:04 +0000

Perfect work!Keep posting

==
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulandredevera

By: BlazeMcHerbs

BlazeMcHerbs — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:55:35 +0000

Its a bad trade? Personally, I’d rather see Curry go to the Sixers so we can team up Zach with Dalembeast, they would compliment each other perfectly.
But if we have to lose Randolph, I wouldn’t mind throwing in Q and picking up Redd with possibly Villanueva, that way Lee can get some more tick at the 4 spot.
All in all, fire Isaah. Forget, I want this man to get humiliated, I want Ashton Kutcher to show up at MSG and Punk this guy real good. What happened to this two week guarantee? Now he thinks these players will get him a ring?
Look, I think he should go out and get Damon Stoudemire from Memphis, so we can bench Marbury, before he even attempts to get McGrady.

By: Darkmanofhouse

Darkmanofhouse — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:09:14 +0000

z-bo… no way get rid of Q. Now that makes sence for M Redd. Q may be a little better on D but like someone said who plays D anymore. A three way trade to bring T-Mac to the Knicks? Wake me up if this Happens!

By: hahns

hahns — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:37:05 +0000

if Isaiah wasnt our coach and didnt already lock up the franchise financially with a zillion other bad trades/buy outs…id say pull the trigger on this. but instead of seeking a player oriented fix… zeke just needs to fire himself.

By: Utes fan

Utes fan — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:09:40 +0000

Milwaukee would have to be out of their mind to make a Redd for Randolph swap. I see wanting a post threat but giving up Mike Redd for Zach Randolph would be insane.

By: JRmessiah

JRmessiah — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:58:12 +0000

YEA I CAN’T SEE THIS TRADE DROPING FOR ONE IT’LL HELP BOTH TEAMS CRAWFORD CAN START AT 2 STEPH AT 1 AND REDD AT 3 LEE AT 4 AND 5 COULD B Z-BO HE PRODUCES MORE HE JUS NEED BETTER COACHING NO ONE IS LISTENING TO ZEKE ANYMORE THAT’S THE PROBLEM BUT I WOULD LOVE THIS TRADE STEPH HAS RAISED HIS GAME UP IN HIS LAST 2 OUTINGS HE IS AVG AROUND 18PPG AND 6AST BUT YEA PLLLEASE MAKE THIS TRADE HAPPEN EVN THO IT WON’T HAHAHA I STILL OVE THE KNICKS THO DROP Q-RICH HE IS A DEAD ASS BUMMM

By: Myrie

Myrie — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:34:25 +0000

This is a nonesense report, but I will comment on it.

Isiah Thomas hasn’t made up his mind in terms of which low post player he wants: Zach Randoplh or Eddy Curry. Clearly, they don’t fit together. One needs to go. They both give you the same thing. Difference is, Zach gets you rebounds, Eddy gives you height and a legit center (even if the production ain’t there).

It was not necessary to trade for Zach. Isiah doesn’t know what type of PF to put beside Curry. Channing Frye didn’t mix well with him either. In fact, Isiah should have moved Frye to the bench and started David Lee at PF. Curry needs a complimentary PF; not a scoring one.

Isiah would rather move Curry, but its not easy to find a 6′11 center who can do things. Curry is not great, but he can do some things occasionally and he has size. Zach on the other hand is a bit more replaceable. It is easier to locate a 20-10 PF these days than it is to locate a center. The rarest commodity in the NBA now is center. So if you have a decent one (Curry?), you got to hold onto him.

Also, Zach Randolph has a higher trade value. But to Milwaukee? Zach needs to be placed beside a defensive center. A center who is going to rebound, block shots and cleaning up his leftovers (Philly/Chicago).

As for Michael Redd, Bucks management is leaning in another direction. They drafted Yi Jilian for pub, but gave big money to Mo Williams and they’ll have to give big money to Bogut. Also, they will be looking for a new coach soon; hence…..a new beginning. Redd prolly doesn’t have a role in the new plan.

But NY is not the destination for him. Utah or SanAn is where suits him. Or even back to Ohio.

Isiah Thomas should have known better. He tried this (same player types) before in the backcourt when he traded for Steve Francis (at Larry Brown’s request ’cause Francis rebounds well for a guard). But it didn’t (would never have) worked with Francis and Marbury.

Thomas should have known Curry/Randolph won’t work. They’re too similar on offense and defense. One has to go. Randolph should be kept, but he’s more replaceable than Curry.

Article has no legs because the Bucks do not have what the Knicks need. Interior defense, perimeter defense and size off the bench.

Don’t expect this move (Michael Redd for Zach Randolph) to every happen.

By: MJAX

MJAX — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:19:14 +0000

What you have to understand about the “P”(Portland), is it’s a low key liberal, yet conservative town. The Blazers are our only big sports attraction around, then the Ducks, and Beavers in Eugene and Corvallis. So when you have these 6′8 dudes at the lil clubs gettin’ loud and being flossy while trying to dictate situations with there status and wealth, it’s not received well by most. Often times it’s either uncalled for or creating jealousy, because that’s all they know. Bottom line is, White folks here don’t really care to see the flossin’, and the Brothas’ here are not too impressed with the arrogance displayed. The difference with the team of today from Zach’s squad. This team is much more mellow and personable and approachable. It’s as if they really appreciate the opportunity they’ve been given and want to please the comsumer/fan and care about winning.

By: GEE ...I got injected with an illegal substance I didn't know about before I wrote this post...dang trainer!!!

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:06:21 +0000

Real corny trade that won’t help either team. They both still gone suck. Even with a horridbury and Redd that won’t change much with losing Zach. In the Bucks case you get 20-10 but you lose character and someone who can throw 30 up easily on any squad. They need to kill that one.

I still the like the possibility of Sam I am going to Boston.