NBA / Feb 13, 2008 / 1:23 pm
If I were a gambler, which of course I’m not…
I should have gone 2-1 last night if the OT hadn’t killed the over/under of the Heat vs. Nuggets. Here is what I like tonight…
*LOVE the Spurs (-3) vs. CAVS – Big Z is banged up (although playing). Field day for Duncan.
Grizzlies (+9.5) vs. SIXERS – Can Memphis put together two solid games in a row? Is Philly really 9.5 points better than the Grizz?
UNDER of the Pacers vs. PISTONS (198) – The Pacers have no point guard and are coming off a toss loss. 198 is a lot of points for these two teams to score.
UNDER of the Suns vs. WARRIORS (238) – I know both these two teams light it up, but 238??? Gotta go under.
HOME TEAM IN CAPS
*My Favorite of the night
-->
February 13th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
calvin brodus says:
You. Are. Killing. Me. Smalls. It’s a good thing you aren’t a gambler, because you would be broke as Mike Jackson after the picks you’ve made the past three days. “I should have gone 2-1 last night”. Come on. I should have nailed Jessica Simpson last night, but she happens to live in a different state, and I happen to not know her. But I should have.
February 13th, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Vertman says:
Ha! Do you even watch NBA basketball?! Pacers have no PG?! You must not be serious! They were up the entire game till Diener went out. He’s a better PG than Tinsley. Have you even seen his assists to TO ratio? The guy can dish it like mad & has a very deadly shot. I’ll say it here, he’s the next Steve Nash, that’s how good this kid is.
February 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Kobeef says:
If Shaq plays Suns vs Warriors will be an all-washed-up game with Webber and Shaq vying for slowest player in the league.
Vertman – Denier is not much of a shooter and is 3 inches shorter than Nash. He is a nice back-up but the Pacers are missing a starting PG.
Speaking of memphis – Pat Riley seems likely to move Jason Williams expiring contract to a rebuilding team like Memphis, Seattle, or Minnesota….Mike Miller?
February 13th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
G says:
Shoulda coulda woulda. Story of my life. I like today’s picks too, fingers crossed since you’re due for a win.
I also like:
Denver (+6) against Orlando
New Orleans (-6.5) against the Bucks
February 13th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
Top Gun says:
U should give up with ur predictions. Ur overall record must be 3-28. Come on man, and some of those games are just plain obvious ! Good luck man cause ur gonna need it.
February 13th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
MoxWestCoastRep says:
Under in the PHX GS game?? thats what they want you to think. Thats a for sure OVER. Take it to the bank. Sucka.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:28 pm
the antoine says:
hahah man you got wrecked on the philly game too.. i guess they were 14 points better than memphis not just 9.5.. good thing youre not a gambling man..
February 13th, 2008 at 11:07 pm
mrcanadian says:
worst column ever. do you pick winners by picking names out of a hat?
February 14th, 2008 at 12:08 am
finally says:
2-1-1. ehhh.
February 14th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
tealish says:
BUDDY, JUST STOP. Find a new job for the sake of those who still haven’t realized how horribly deficient your knowledge in basketball is!
Lol @ the lame OT excuse. Overtime is part of basketball, is it not? Here’s what I PREDICT in the coming days:
The Non-Gambler> I would’ve been 1-2 if Iverson hadn’t gone for 50..
The Non-Gambler> I would’ve been 2-2 if Kobe hadn’t reinjured his finger…
The Non-Gamber> Sorry guys, tough break. Who knew DHoward would score 25 and Gasol putting up 30? All unforseeable, tough break guys…
The Non-Gamber> If the Lakers hit that miracle three at the end and forced a high scoring OT, I would’ve pulled out one… sorry guys
February 16th, 2008 at 12:23 am
jamesinva says:
yea go back and look at these predictions, other than the spurs u lost em all. and honestly i cant hate on you for it. because id pretty much go with all you had BEFORE hand, betting (which I did) and getting cracked (AGAIN) gambling aint for me and this column obviously aint for u. get someone legit on this. or start doin college bball or somethin