<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is Crazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/</link>
	<description>Dime is your daily source for NBA News, NBA Trades, NBA Rumors, NBA Videos and Sneakers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byrd</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29390</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29390</guid>
		<description>Yo for real who cares?  Its a MAGAZINE COVER!  You guys gunna stop buying LeBron kicks and jerseys because of it?  Any pub is good pub.  You guys think his image is ruined now?  He is no longer marketable, we had better hope someone from college can come in and be the new league savior.
Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo for real who cares?  Its a MAGAZINE COVER!  You guys gunna stop buying LeBron kicks and jerseys because of it?  Any pub is good pub.  You guys think his image is ruined now?  He is no longer marketable, we had better hope someone from college can come in and be the new league savior.<br />
Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YOUNGFED</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29351</link>
		<dc:creator>YOUNGFED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29351</guid>
		<description>Dime if you can translate that I&#039;ll be truly AMAZED.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dime if you can translate that I&#8217;ll be truly AMAZED.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YOUNGFED</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29350</link>
		<dc:creator>YOUNGFED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29350</guid>
		<description>Vince:
WTF (x)10, I went to College graduated with a 3.8 gpa and still don&#039;t know what the hell your talking about dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince:<br />
WTF (x)10, I went to College graduated with a 3.8 gpa and still don&#8217;t know what the hell your talking about dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vince</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29346</link>
		<dc:creator>vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29346</guid>
		<description>No, YOUNGFED, you were supposed to see that, as intriguing as geometric Newtonian gravity may be, its basis, classical mechanics, is merely a limiting case of (special) relativistic mechanics;[11] in the language of symmetry: where gravity can be neglected, physics is Lorentz invariant, not Galilei invariant – and the differences between the two become significant when we are dealing with fast motions or high-energy phenomena.

Lorentz symmetry introduces an additional conformal structure, namely the set of lightcones (see the image on the left). For each event A, there is a set of events that can, in principle, either influence or be influenced by A via signals or interactions that do not need to travel faster than light (such as event B in the image), and a set of events for which such an influence is impossible (such as event C in the image). These sets are observer-independent.

Special relativity is defined in the absence of gravity, so for practical applications, it is a suitable model whenever gravity can be neglected. As gravity comes into play, assuming the universality of free fall, an analogous reasoning as in the previous section applies: there are no global inertial frames. Instead there are approximate inertial frames moving alongside freely falling particles; translated into the language of space-time: the straight time-like lines that define a gravity-free inertial frame are deformed to lines that are curved relative to each other, suggesting that the inclusion of gravity necessitates a change in spacetime geometry.

A priori, it is not clear whether the new local frames in free fall are indeed those in which the laws of special relativity hold – that theory, is based on the propagation of light, and thus on electromagnetism, and its preferred frames might not be the same as the local free-falling inertial frames. But using different assumptions about the special-relativistic frames (such as their being earth-fixed, or in free fall), one can derive different predictions for the gravitational redshift; the actual measurements show that free-falling frames in which light propagates as it does in special relativity. The generalization of this statement, namely that the laws of special relativity hold, to good approximation, in freely falling (and non-rotating) reference frames, is known as the Einstein [equivalence principle], and is one of the guiding principles when it comes to generalizing special relativistic physics to include gravity.

However, again with reference to experimental data, it becomes clear that, for instance, proper time for clocks in a gravitational field, is not measured by the Minkowski metric of special relativity. As in the Newtonian case, this is suggestive of a more general geometry: where all reference frames in free fall are equivalent, and approximately Minkowskian, we are dealing with a curved generalization of Minkowski space: instead of Minkowskian, assume the metric tensor to be, more generally, semi-Riemannian. Furthermore, each Riemannian metric is naturally associated with one particular kind of connection, a Levi-Civita connection; assume this to be the connection implied by the universality of free fall...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, YOUNGFED, you were supposed to see that, as intriguing as geometric Newtonian gravity may be, its basis, classical mechanics, is merely a limiting case of (special) relativistic mechanics;[11] in the language of symmetry: where gravity can be neglected, physics is Lorentz invariant, not Galilei invariant – and the differences between the two become significant when we are dealing with fast motions or high-energy phenomena.</p>
<p>Lorentz symmetry introduces an additional conformal structure, namely the set of lightcones (see the image on the left). For each event A, there is a set of events that can, in principle, either influence or be influenced by A via signals or interactions that do not need to travel faster than light (such as event B in the image), and a set of events for which such an influence is impossible (such as event C in the image). These sets are observer-independent.</p>
<p>Special relativity is defined in the absence of gravity, so for practical applications, it is a suitable model whenever gravity can be neglected. As gravity comes into play, assuming the universality of free fall, an analogous reasoning as in the previous section applies: there are no global inertial frames. Instead there are approximate inertial frames moving alongside freely falling particles; translated into the language of space-time: the straight time-like lines that define a gravity-free inertial frame are deformed to lines that are curved relative to each other, suggesting that the inclusion of gravity necessitates a change in spacetime geometry.</p>
<p>A priori, it is not clear whether the new local frames in free fall are indeed those in which the laws of special relativity hold – that theory, is based on the propagation of light, and thus on electromagnetism, and its preferred frames might not be the same as the local free-falling inertial frames. But using different assumptions about the special-relativistic frames (such as their being earth-fixed, or in free fall), one can derive different predictions for the gravitational redshift; the actual measurements show that free-falling frames in which light propagates as it does in special relativity. The generalization of this statement, namely that the laws of special relativity hold, to good approximation, in freely falling (and non-rotating) reference frames, is known as the Einstein [equivalence principle], and is one of the guiding principles when it comes to generalizing special relativistic physics to include gravity.</p>
<p>However, again with reference to experimental data, it becomes clear that, for instance, proper time for clocks in a gravitational field, is not measured by the Minkowski metric of special relativity. As in the Newtonian case, this is suggestive of a more general geometry: where all reference frames in free fall are equivalent, and approximately Minkowskian, we are dealing with a curved generalization of Minkowski space: instead of Minkowskian, assume the metric tensor to be, more generally, semi-Riemannian. Furthermore, each Riemannian metric is naturally associated with one particular kind of connection, a Levi-Civita connection; assume this to be the connection implied by the universality of free fall&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YOUNGFED</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29332</link>
		<dc:creator>YOUNGFED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29332</guid>
		<description>OK Dime I click on it but don&#039;t know exactly what I was supposed to see.  Unless its the that Lebron looks exactly like King Kong. LMAO.

Get at me and let me know if that was it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Dime I click on it but don&#8217;t know exactly what I was supposed to see.  Unless its the that Lebron looks exactly like King Kong. LMAO.</p>
<p>Get at me and let me know if that was it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: word</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29331</link>
		<dc:creator>word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29331</guid>
		<description>it ain&#039;t nothing about a white girl on his arm it&#039;s about his damn facial expression, shit why is that so hard to understand. if he had a normal face on it would&#039;ve been fine but he looks like and idiot on the cover and the picture inside he looks gay straight homo. and the same photographer that did those shots is the one who did jennifer hudson when she was on it and made her look wack too with a horrible expression actually similar to lebrons and just plain wack looking. that magazine is straight racist trying to make blacks look like brutal savage&#039;s coming out the jungle like blacks ain&#039;t civilized. its quite disgusting but they have to please their white audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it ain&#8217;t nothing about a white girl on his arm it&#8217;s about his damn facial expression, shit why is that so hard to understand. if he had a normal face on it would&#8217;ve been fine but he looks like and idiot on the cover and the picture inside he looks gay straight homo. and the same photographer that did those shots is the one who did jennifer hudson when she was on it and made her look wack too with a horrible expression actually similar to lebrons and just plain wack looking. that magazine is straight racist trying to make blacks look like brutal savage&#8217;s coming out the jungle like blacks ain&#8217;t civilized. its quite disgusting but they have to please their white audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankie</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29320</link>
		<dc:creator>frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29320</guid>
		<description>Haha.  I get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha.  I get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josefk</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29319</link>
		<dc:creator>josefk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29319</guid>
		<description>yes frankie, have encountered these arguments before. 

1) There are victims everywhere. Everyone&#039;s being oppressed. So am I. But do I let it get to me? Oh no way! I&#039;m way above that,and you should too. 

2) The only way to rise out of your victimhood status is to beat your oppressors at their own game, show them you can make it big and flaunt your wealth. Then you can also show everyone that you weren&#039;t really oppressed at all, only psychologically. There&#039;s nothing wrong with the system. It&#039;s just you. 

3) Don&#039;t talk about oppression. Live with what we have, which seems to work best for most people anyway, and shut the fuck up and take your angst someplace else. 

 http://www.nyupress.org/books/Living_Through_the_Hoop-products_id-5178.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes frankie, have encountered these arguments before. </p>
<p>1) There are victims everywhere. Everyone&#8217;s being oppressed. So am I. But do I let it get to me? Oh no way! I&#8217;m way above that,and you should too. </p>
<p>2) The only way to rise out of your victimhood status is to beat your oppressors at their own game, show them you can make it big and flaunt your wealth. Then you can also show everyone that you weren&#8217;t really oppressed at all, only psychologically. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with the system. It&#8217;s just you. </p>
<p>3) Don&#8217;t talk about oppression. Live with what we have, which seems to work best for most people anyway, and shut the fuck up and take your angst someplace else. </p>
<p> <a href="http://www.nyupress.org/books/Living_Through_the_Hoop-products_id-5178.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nyupress.org/books/Living_Through_the_Hoop-products_id-5178.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josefk</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29318</link>
		<dc:creator>josefk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29318</guid>
		<description>yes frankie, have encountered these arguments before. 

1) There are victims everywhere. Everyone&#039;s being oppressed. So am I. But do I let it get to me? Oh no way! I&#039;m way above that,and you should too. 

2) The only way to rise out of your victimhood status is to beat your oppressors at their own game, show them you can make it big and flaunt your wealth. Then you can also show everyone that you weren&#039;t really oppressed at all, only psychologically. There&#039;s nothing wrong with the system. It&#039;s just you. 

3) Don&#039;t talk about oppression. Live with what we have, which seems to work best for most people anyway, and shut the fuck up and take your angst someplace else. 


p.s. for all dime readers: http://www.nyupress.org/books/Living_Through_the_Hoop-products_id-5178.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes frankie, have encountered these arguments before. </p>
<p>1) There are victims everywhere. Everyone&#8217;s being oppressed. So am I. But do I let it get to me? Oh no way! I&#8217;m way above that,and you should too. </p>
<p>2) The only way to rise out of your victimhood status is to beat your oppressors at their own game, show them you can make it big and flaunt your wealth. Then you can also show everyone that you weren&#8217;t really oppressed at all, only psychologically. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with the system. It&#8217;s just you. </p>
<p>3) Don&#8217;t talk about oppression. Live with what we have, which seems to work best for most people anyway, and shut the fuck up and take your angst someplace else. </p>
<p>p.s. for all dime readers: <a href="http://www.nyupress.org/books/Living_Through_the_Hoop-products_id-5178.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nyupress.org/books/Living_Through_the_Hoop-products_id-5178.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankie</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/03/this-is-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-29314</link>
		<dc:creator>frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/03/19/this-is-crazy/#comment-29314</guid>
		<description>Oh yea, and p.s. - any time a black guy has a white girl on his arm, does that mean he&#039;s being compared to King Kong?  (AKA an unstoppable physical force - again, must be rough.)  Beware all black men:  if you have a white girlfriend, do not hold her in one arm!  You WILL be compared to King Kong!  That&#039;s a bad thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yea, and p.s. &#8211; any time a black guy has a white girl on his arm, does that mean he&#8217;s being compared to King Kong?  (AKA an unstoppable physical force &#8211; again, must be rough.)  Beware all black men:  if you have a white girlfriend, do not hold her in one arm!  You WILL be compared to King Kong!  That&#8217;s a bad thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.036 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 338/342 objects using memcached

Served from: dimemag.com @ 2012-02-12 22:54:50 -->
