<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Do You Define Greatness?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/</link>
	<description>Dime is your daily source for NBA News, NBA Trades, NBA Rumors, NBA Videos and Sneakers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagomar</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41730</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagomar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41730</guid>
		<description>Greatness is in the intersection of heart and talent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greatness is in the intersection of heart and talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camb0dia</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41474</link>
		<dc:creator>Camb0dia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41474</guid>
		<description>simple put rings dont decide greatness, but if there are two people who are about the same skill level, then post season success which leads to rings is the deciding factor. SImply put KG vs TD name 5 moments of &quot;takeover&quot; that each gives, i can name one off the top of my head for KG (game 7 vs Kings) and a large amount for TD (game 7 pistons, the near quad double against nets, game one against suns, .4 shot (yes i know he didn&#039;t hit it, but you guys do know about the shot before hand) when the game is close, you know, more often than not great players are money. good players are not. thats the difference. and with steph, would u rather have him or KJ? Don&#039;t think marbury ever got out of the first round.

its a copout to compare horry with barkely, one guy plays at most 25 games a season with 100% and the other was counted on to score 20-10 most of his career</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simple put rings dont decide greatness, but if there are two people who are about the same skill level, then post season success which leads to rings is the deciding factor. SImply put KG vs TD name 5 moments of &#8220;takeover&#8221; that each gives, i can name one off the top of my head for KG (game 7 vs Kings) and a large amount for TD (game 7 pistons, the near quad double against nets, game one against suns, .4 shot (yes i know he didn&#8217;t hit it, but you guys do know about the shot before hand) when the game is close, you know, more often than not great players are money. good players are not. thats the difference. and with steph, would u rather have him or KJ? Don&#8217;t think marbury ever got out of the first round.</p>
<p>its a copout to compare horry with barkely, one guy plays at most 25 games a season with 100% and the other was counted on to score 20-10 most of his career</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_don_mega</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41453</link>
		<dc:creator>the_don_mega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 08:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41453</guid>
		<description>@ kowtz

u got that right!!!
and for me...
great ones never choke...
they thrive on pressure...
KG is awesome...
but he chokes every time around...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ kowtz</p>
<p>u got that right!!!<br />
and for me&#8230;<br />
great ones never choke&#8230;<br />
they thrive on pressure&#8230;<br />
KG is awesome&#8230;<br />
but he chokes every time around&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kowtz</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41436</link>
		<dc:creator>kowtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 06:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41436</guid>
		<description>Greatness is defined where:

In 1993 in the Philippines almost everybody knew who Michael Jordan is... But only about 5% of those knew what the NBA was, and who the Chicago Bulls were...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greatness is defined where:</p>
<p>In 1993 in the Philippines almost everybody knew who Michael Jordan is&#8230; But only about 5% of those knew what the NBA was, and who the Chicago Bulls were&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celts Fan</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41373</link>
		<dc:creator>Celts Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41373</guid>
		<description>Greatness is that &quot;it&quot; factor that you know when you&#039;re watching it.  If you were a fan of any team that wasn&#039;t the Bulls in the 90s and you&#039;re up 1, 10 seconds left, Bulls ball, you already know how it&#039;s going to end.  You could say the same about Kobe.  I&#039;m not just saying a guy that will hit all the shots, but the guy that you know will make the big play.  Isaih, Magic, CP3, Steve Nash, JKidd are PGs like that (On obviously different levels, but Nash, Kidd, and CP3 have made TONS of huge plays for their teams and won a lot of games over the past decade.) Duncan is a big guy like that, and KG hasn&#039;t been.  Arguing KG&#039;s better than Duncan is insane.  KG has more all-around talent, but Duncan has that IT.  Apparently he found a 3 ball just in time too...

That doesn&#039;t just extend to scorers either.  Robert Horry was great on a much smaller, but still very important scale.  How many guys have made that many huge shots to win that many rings?  Dennis Rodman was great because he was probably the best role player ever. I think the Worm should get into the Hall, but he was literally JUST a rebounder and defender, he was AMAZING at both, but you&#039;re playing 4 on 5 on offense.  Dennis Rodman was Ben Wallace, but with funny hair, tattoos, dresses, and was almost certainly psychotic, but that guy would kill himself to win, he just seemed to wanted it more, and he ended up with a handful of rings.  Karl Malone was obviously a much better overall player, but he was never great.  He notoriously came up small in big moments, which MJ immortalized with the strip that lead to the &quot;last&quot; shot.  Rodman would be the guy that would rip the ball from his hands on the boards or lock him down defensively.  HE came up big when it mattered in his role, it was just a lesser role than the superstar/#1 option that Malone was.  He would never get you 20 points, but he could OWN the glass and lock down his guy defensively.  He was GREAT in a less important role than Malone&#039;s. His teams didn&#039;t seem to rise to another level when it mattered.  

Shane Battier was GREAT at Duke (and he was great at Duke, he&#039;s a real good role player in the pros, but he was great at Duke, he also has ridges in his head.  I fuckin hate Duke) because he just seemed to make all the right plays.  that dude took 7 charges a game and and always seemed to make a huge impact on the game in a lot of different ways.

To sum it up pretty bluntly about the ROLE PLAYERS (the great players, Kobe types has been beaten to death and it&#039;s all on point) since I didn&#039;t get to finish the point, but the 2nd half just started:               There&#039;s a reason Steve Kerr, Robert Horry, Dennis Rodman, Ben Wallace (the Detroit Ben Wallace, before he got old, was GREAT as a defensive enforcer) have a fistful of rings and have always seemed to be on contenders and Ricky Davis will never be on a team that wins more than 12 games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greatness is that &#8220;it&#8221; factor that you know when you&#8217;re watching it.  If you were a fan of any team that wasn&#8217;t the Bulls in the 90s and you&#8217;re up 1, 10 seconds left, Bulls ball, you already know how it&#8217;s going to end.  You could say the same about Kobe.  I&#8217;m not just saying a guy that will hit all the shots, but the guy that you know will make the big play.  Isaih, Magic, CP3, Steve Nash, JKidd are PGs like that (On obviously different levels, but Nash, Kidd, and CP3 have made TONS of huge plays for their teams and won a lot of games over the past decade.) Duncan is a big guy like that, and KG hasn&#8217;t been.  Arguing KG&#8217;s better than Duncan is insane.  KG has more all-around talent, but Duncan has that IT.  Apparently he found a 3 ball just in time too&#8230;</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t just extend to scorers either.  Robert Horry was great on a much smaller, but still very important scale.  How many guys have made that many huge shots to win that many rings?  Dennis Rodman was great because he was probably the best role player ever. I think the Worm should get into the Hall, but he was literally JUST a rebounder and defender, he was AMAZING at both, but you&#8217;re playing 4 on 5 on offense.  Dennis Rodman was Ben Wallace, but with funny hair, tattoos, dresses, and was almost certainly psychotic, but that guy would kill himself to win, he just seemed to wanted it more, and he ended up with a handful of rings.  Karl Malone was obviously a much better overall player, but he was never great.  He notoriously came up small in big moments, which MJ immortalized with the strip that lead to the &#8220;last&#8221; shot.  Rodman would be the guy that would rip the ball from his hands on the boards or lock him down defensively.  HE came up big when it mattered in his role, it was just a lesser role than the superstar/#1 option that Malone was.  He would never get you 20 points, but he could OWN the glass and lock down his guy defensively.  He was GREAT in a less important role than Malone&#8217;s. His teams didn&#8217;t seem to rise to another level when it mattered.  </p>
<p>Shane Battier was GREAT at Duke (and he was great at Duke, he&#8217;s a real good role player in the pros, but he was great at Duke, he also has ridges in his head.  I fuckin hate Duke) because he just seemed to make all the right plays.  that dude took 7 charges a game and and always seemed to make a huge impact on the game in a lot of different ways.</p>
<p>To sum it up pretty bluntly about the ROLE PLAYERS (the great players, Kobe types has been beaten to death and it&#8217;s all on point) since I didn&#8217;t get to finish the point, but the 2nd half just started:               There&#8217;s a reason Steve Kerr, Robert Horry, Dennis Rodman, Ben Wallace (the Detroit Ben Wallace, before he got old, was GREAT as a defensive enforcer) have a fistful of rings and have always seemed to be on contenders and Ricky Davis will never be on a team that wins more than 12 games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daquest?on</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41370</link>
		<dc:creator>daquest?on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41370</guid>
		<description>@ austin u know better than most of us  that stats arent everything and also  marbury is a proven loser he is a great person(from what ive heard) but hes kinda crazy he has baggage and all that comes into consideration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ austin u know better than most of us  that stats arent everything and also  marbury is a proven loser he is a great person(from what ive heard) but hes kinda crazy he has baggage and all that comes into consideration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Burton</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41366</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41366</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not even much of a Stephon Marbury fan, but...

1. His name came up in the post because someone in the office asked was Steph one of the 50 best (or 50 &quot;greatest&quot;) point guards ever.

2. Say what you want about him, but you can&#039;t deny Marbury&#039;s numbers. Until last season I believe, his career averages sat at 20 ppg and 8 apg - which as people have already stated, only he and Oscar Robertson had achieved that.

3. Even with the recent dip, Marbury still ranks 12th all-time in assists-per-game average at 7.7 apg. That&#039;s higher than Bob Cousy, Tiny Archibald, Rod Strickland, Baron Davis, Mark Price, Gary Payton, Mo Cheeks, Lenny Wilkens, Walt Frazier, Kenny Anderson, Chauncey Billups, Tony Parker, etc.

4. Marbury&#039;s 19.7 ppg scoring average ranks 61st all-time: higher than Magic Johnson, Grant Hill, Isiah Thomas, Walt Frazier, Earl Monroe, Tiny Archibald, Artis Gilmore, Willis Reed, Bob Cousy, Reggie Miller, Chris Mullin, Calvin Murphy, Rip Hamilton, Kevin Johnson, Kevin McHale, Tim Hardaway, etc.

So is Marbury really THAT bad? He trumps Tiny Archibald in both points and assists, and Tiny&#039;s only championship was won with the Celtics, when Tiny was 32 years old and the 4th or 5th best player on the team. (Bird, Parish, McHale, Maxwell.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not even much of a Stephon Marbury fan, but&#8230;</p>
<p>1. His name came up in the post because someone in the office asked was Steph one of the 50 best (or 50 &#8220;greatest&#8221;) point guards ever.</p>
<p>2. Say what you want about him, but you can&#8217;t deny Marbury&#8217;s numbers. Until last season I believe, his career averages sat at 20 ppg and 8 apg &#8211; which as people have already stated, only he and Oscar Robertson had achieved that.</p>
<p>3. Even with the recent dip, Marbury still ranks 12th all-time in assists-per-game average at 7.7 apg. That&#8217;s higher than Bob Cousy, Tiny Archibald, Rod Strickland, Baron Davis, Mark Price, Gary Payton, Mo Cheeks, Lenny Wilkens, Walt Frazier, Kenny Anderson, Chauncey Billups, Tony Parker, etc.</p>
<p>4. Marbury&#8217;s 19.7 ppg scoring average ranks 61st all-time: higher than Magic Johnson, Grant Hill, Isiah Thomas, Walt Frazier, Earl Monroe, Tiny Archibald, Artis Gilmore, Willis Reed, Bob Cousy, Reggie Miller, Chris Mullin, Calvin Murphy, Rip Hamilton, Kevin Johnson, Kevin McHale, Tim Hardaway, etc.</p>
<p>So is Marbury really THAT bad? He trumps Tiny Archibald in both points and assists, and Tiny&#8217;s only championship was won with the Celtics, when Tiny was 32 years old and the 4th or 5th best player on the team. (Bird, Parish, McHale, Maxwell.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ding Dong the Hornets are Dead</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41365</link>
		<dc:creator>Ding Dong the Hornets are Dead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41365</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s real simple: It&#039;s gotta be the shoes.

I think you gotta excel and have the killer instinct at both ends of the floor (MJ, Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Dr J, Kobe, Joe D, Jackie Moon), with the exception of 2 players who weren&#039;t that good defensively but are great because they played with limitations: Bird and Barkley. One was white, and the other was undersized and overweight.

Mvps, rings, allstar games and other accoloades has too many moving parts to judge individual greatness.

And you can&#039;t be boring like TD.

Robert Horry is the John McLean of hoops in the bizzaro world: right guy at right place at the right time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s real simple: It&#8217;s gotta be the shoes.</p>
<p>I think you gotta excel and have the killer instinct at both ends of the floor (MJ, Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Dr J, Kobe, Joe D, Jackie Moon), with the exception of 2 players who weren&#8217;t that good defensively but are great because they played with limitations: Bird and Barkley. One was white, and the other was undersized and overweight.</p>
<p>Mvps, rings, allstar games and other accoloades has too many moving parts to judge individual greatness.</p>
<p>And you can&#8217;t be boring like TD.</p>
<p>Robert Horry is the John McLean of hoops in the bizzaro world: right guy at right place at the right time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaPro</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41360</link>
		<dc:creator>DaPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41360</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s shits dead its a fact you post Paul and and go at him. 

The same knock was made against Kobe, post him up with a bigger two. Thats is Paul&#039;s weakness on d, playing bigger twos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s shits dead its a fact you post Paul and and go at him. </p>
<p>The same knock was made against Kobe, post him up with a bigger two. Thats is Paul&#8217;s weakness on d, playing bigger twos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaPro</title>
		<link>http://dimemag.com/2008/05/how-do-you-define-greatness/comment-page-2/#comment-41359</link>
		<dc:creator>DaPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dimemag.com/2008/05/21/how-do-you-define-greatness/#comment-41359</guid>
		<description>@ Yooo 
Oh the name calling b- A wise man told me don&#039;t argue with fools
Cause people from a distance can&#039;t tell who is who
So stop with that childish shit, nigga I&#039;m grown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Yooo<br />
Oh the name calling b- A wise man told me don&#8217;t argue with fools<br />
Cause people from a distance can&#8217;t tell who is who<br />
So stop with that childish shit, nigga I&#8217;m grown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/17 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 341/348 objects using memcached

Served from: dimemag.com @ 2012-02-13 02:12:56 -->
