Comments on: LeBron in 2010: Knicks or Nets?

By: Nets

Nets — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:39:25 +0000

Nets got Jay Z, young talent (harris, CDR, courtney lee, brook lopez, etc.) and a new arena. What more could LeBron want. All he has with the Knicks is MSG, Dont get me wrong, MSG is the shit, but he has more in Brooklyn .

By: Knicks

Knicks — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:19:26 +0000

Lebron will be a Knick

Says here:
http://fortunes.on.nimp.org/

By: ---------------------

--------------------- — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:15:48 +0000

Cigarette BUTT/HOLE in one.

By: squeege

squeege — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:14:19 +0000

The very fact that the Knicks aren’t very good IS the reason to go there. To Be The Savior.

By: never-to-return

never-to-return — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:12:07 +0000

Who would want to play for the Nets? Not even if Beyonce served up her tight butthole.

By: JJ

JJ — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:44:27 +0000

If he doesn’t stay in Cleveland. New Jersey has Jay-Z and LeBron has said he like Brooklyn best. But I also think he really likes the atmosphere at the Madison square garden and is attracted the history of the Knicks. People say the Knicks suck, but they do have Nate Robinson who is capable of having huge games, they have David Lee, and Al Harrington. Mobley, Richardson, Hughes, and Wilcox can be good role players. And don’t forget, the Knick will most likely get Stephen Curry, who is good friends with LeBron. Where would the Cavs be without LeBron. They would have been a sub-500 team in the Eastern Conference, let’s be honest, probably even worse than the Knicks or Nets. Williams is not a star, West is pretty good, but also not someone who can average more than 20 PPG, Varejo isn’t that great, Gibson is young, big Z is getting old, Wally is so inconsistent. The NY roster is better than the Cavs if they also had LeBron.

The Nets only have Devin Harris because the Nets would have to get rid of Carter to have enough room for James most likely. Knicks only have to get rid of Duhon, and a few other role players. Then you’d have Stephen Curry if they get him, Nate Robinson, LeBron and Al Harrington. Much better than the Cavs starting 5. Remember, the Nets only won 2 more games than the Knicks. With LeBron, they could do a lot better.

I myself would like to see some major changes in order to keep things interesting. Although I think it would be great for Cleveland to win SOMETHING. I don’t like the Cavs, but I do feel bad for the city of Cleveland.

By: Bill

Bill — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:15:55 +0000

LJ is not going anywhere, he loves if here in Ohio.

By: amare

amare — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:35:13 +0000

Lebron James is obviously not truely choosing the nets or the knicks. They are both in a fantasy world thinking they are going to get him. The one team that is going to land him are the bulls. Not only is this team better set to support him with a stronger cast of players, but his buisness status would boom with all the coverage on the bulls getting the next mj. It’s the best choice.

By: marvin

marvin — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:12:14 +0000

If he puts winning above anything else then he’ll go back to Cleveland period.

By: karan

karan — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:02:34 +0000

I cosign everything “How can anyone be from Brooklyn and ever call themselves a Nets fan? Knicks bitches” just wrote, including his display name.