NBA / Dec 29, 2008 / 2:17 pm

5 Trade Deadline Possibilities

Vince CarterVince to LAC?

There have already been a ton of moves made this season, but with tight races on both coasts, there’s room for more. SI’s Ian Thomsen throws five trade deadline possibilities out there, in order to turn possible contenders into real players, while securing the fate of others in the lottery.

1. G Vince Carter to the Clippers; C Chris Kaman and G Eric Gordon to the Nets
2. C-F Rasheed Wallace to the Hornets; C Tyson Chandler to the Pistons
3. C Brad Miller to the Cavaliers; G Eric Snow and F J.J. Hickson to the Kings
4. G-F Anthony Parker and F-C Nathan Jawai to the Bucks; G Charlie Bell and F Austin Croshere to the Raptors
5. F Joe Smith to the Nuggets; G Chucky Atkins and a first-round pick to the Thunder

Which of these deals makes the most sense, and why?

Source: SI

Related Posts with Thumbnails

43 Responses to “5 Trade Deadline Possibilities”

  1. haslem says:

    #4 dosent really make sense

  2. R.ELI says:

    I thought Eric Snow was retired

  3. dmitry of jersey says:

    neither does #1. the nets are committed to brook lopez and only the clippers are dumb enough to have two pure centers who both deserve to start on the same roster.

  4. Ross says:

    None of them really make sense

  5. GEE...Now yo party wasn't jumpin and yo dj was weak! says:

    Gotta be more than those 5 on the horizon.

    I like #1.

    Houston might pull something out of their hat.

  6. miamiVIS3 says:

    only #3 and #5 rellay work for me

  7. Mike C says:

    If #3 goes down, then the Cavs leapfrog both Lakers and Celtics this season.

  8. isotope says:

    #1? I understand Devin needs a backup but Vince? He and Harris are the only ones who score on that squad.
    #2 doesnt either. You cant expect Rasheed to play against centers (esp in the West). Except ure expecting him to back up David West.
    #3? Brad Miller AND Z? They do the same things.
    #4. I’m not sure who that’s supposed to help.
    #5. this i can maybe see. But isnt foward the nuggets strongest position?

  9. Kudabeen says:

    I can see number 5 with a 2nd rounder, but I can’t see the rest happening…And I’d think Thunder can get a bit more for Joe Smith than Chucky…Thunder should be able to get a younger 2 guard with promise…

  10. DJ Go Go Gomez says:

    The Cavs should make that move. They should move Wally instead tho. They have enough shooters. Brad would be a perfect back-up for big Z because of their similar game. Plus he’s a better passer so the 2nd unit guys would get better shots. I also think he’s the perfect compliment for Andy V on for their 2nd team.

  11. CitizenB says:

    Someone take Marion…..please?!?! He’s stinking it up down here!!!

    #6. Marion to OKC for cash and an ear of corn

  12. isotope says:

    Gee, too bad the Rockets can’t get rid of TMac now. Maybe they deal Landry and/or Chuck Hayes but I dont see much in return for that.

  13. George W Kush Sr says:

    Seriously, #3 and #5 make cents, but them other ones are need some explanation. Why trade away your only perimeter defender in Parker for a backup PG and Croshere? That would leave the Raps with 4 Point Guards, Calderon, Soloman, Ukic and Bell, wft?

  14. George W Kush Sr says:

    wtf, god dammit!

  15. isotope says:

    CitizenB, Marion for TMac?

  16. L.S. says:

    #5 makes sense for the Thunder… They need all the first-round picks they can get…

  17. G says:

    So is the Dime staff still on vacation? Pretty weak day in terms of articles.

  18. Shogun says:

    Eric Gordon and Chris Kaman for Kevin Love and Mike Miller.

  19. banga says:

    VINCE to LAC would be deadly..

    Starting lineup would be

    Baron
    Vince
    Al Thornton
    Z-Bo
    Camby

    With Eric Gordon off the Bench.. I could see that work.. all they need to do is fire mike Donleavy Sr and They’re good to go

  20. AB_40 says:

    only no.5 makes sense and that won’t happen because he’ll get bought out and end up with the celtics… there I said it

  21. control says:

    banga

    The Clips would still lose, it’s bred into their franchise.

  22. the cynic says:

    im going to trade my Mcdonalds’s chicken nuggets for wendy’s chicken nuggets; do you guys think that is a good trade possibility?

  23. George W Kush Sr says:

    @ the cynic ,

    You should try the King’s Chicken Strips, or the Colonel’s Chicken Fries. Its like trading a guard for a lanky forward.

  24. K Dizzle says:

    @ post 19

    no Gordon off the bench cuz he’s in Jersey in a trade for Vince

    slow news day….

  25. Jei says:

    The trade deadline won’t be complete without MARK CUBAN and the MAVS!

  26. Talented says:

    Brad Miller to Cleveland. Gives them some what of another scoring threat in the paint

  27. Pioneer says:

    The Cavs wouldn’t trade Hickson in any deal that involved only Brad Miller. That rumor was thrown around by a Sacto columnist and promptly shot down by Cavs beat reporters. The Cleveland front office wouldn’t even consider it.

    If Joe Smith gets bought out – not unlikely – he’ll end up in Cleveland again.

  28. Phillyfanatic says:

    I got to go with #3…the Cavs could use the extra post threat and with Miller’s expiring contract (I think) they’ll have some extra cash to make a move that will keep LBJ in Clevland. Miller could also give them a legitimate second unit as well. Snow is just collecting a paycheck and they could afford to off Hickson now.

  29. rangerjohn says:

    i say david lee of the knicks for j vaugn and ian mahinmi of the spurs

  30. goonther says:

    #3 would make me the happiest of cavs fans in the world – its only a matter of time before big ben goes down w/ some sort of back spasm injury again and we’ll need that backup come late season

  31. UncheckedAggression says:

    I can’t believe what I am seeing. You guys actually think Brad Miller is a decent player and he would make a team better? Seriously!? That guy is COMPLETELY WORTHLESS. The last thing the Cavs need is a pussy on the inside that refuses to play D. The Kings should have gotten rid of him when people thought he was good. Now people know and the Kings are stuck with him. The Cavs are committed to defense and there is no way they would be willing to play 4 on 5 on D just so they could have another guy to distribute sometimes and hit wide-open midrange jumpers on offense.

    Luckily the Cavs organization isn’t as stupid as most fans.

  32. Spliff 2 My Lou says:

    The Magic should make a play for Brad Miller. I don’t know what they have to offer but the Magic need another low post presence.

  33. D-NICE says:

    all those trades are pretty shit especially the raptors – bucks scenario

  34. added says:

    none of those deals make sense?

  35. Me says:

    Why on Earth would the Nets trade Vince? He’s one of only two guys who can score. They will probably make the playoffs right now, but if they trade Vince, forget about it.

    This sounds like bullshit. At least I hope so.

  36. Mr. A says:

    All 5 of these trades, the SI writer bullshitted BIG TIME. No basis in fact for any of them, if I had to fashion a guess.

    Anyway, Hickson’s going to be boss in a few years, I would envision that he’s untouchable in any trade not involving CB4…

  37. t8mas says:

    #2 is insulting.. sheed is a great player.. its unfair to have a one-on-one trade with chandler.

  38. My 2 Cents says:

    Yeah why would the nets trade Carter, it would only make LAC a better team and it does nothing for the nets.

    This is a stupid article, most of these trades do not make any sense!!!

  39. JCARR says:

    Eric Snow? He’s an analyst in NBA TV.

    Hickson for Miller makes sense. bring ben wallace of the bench.

    Rasheed for Chandler makes sense. Rasheed is a true post presence while David West shoots from 15 feet. Chandler will hopefully resurrect his game in Detroooitt’ along with the D’

  40. aj says:

    houston has a rumor that “chuck, carl, and luther” to miami for “marion”

  41. jimmy says:

    #4 because bogut and jawaii are both aussie, = good chemistry

  42. Kobeef says:

    #1 – NO – The nets really don’t want or need Kaman who has a big contract and is always injured. Also, Vince is working out kind of well with Harris.

    #2 – NO – Possibly the stupidest trade suggestion of the bunch. Chandler does exactly what the Hornets need him to do – rebound and block shots without expecting to see the plays called for him. Rasheed’s contract expries at the end of the season and I can’t think of why the hornets would give up and top 5 young center for Rasheed.

    #3 – YES -Miller needs out of Sactown and Cleveland needs a real PF instead of Ben Wallace who is really a bench player at this point.

    #4 – Who cares? Seems like a completely pointless trade.

    #5 – NO – The thunder can get a lot more for Joe than Atkins who would be a third string PG (after Westbrook and Watson).

  43. Isaiah says:

    Houston to get Marion, another smallforward for two pfs who are a big part of the rotation is a terrrrible rumor.

Highschoolhoop
Follow Dime Magazine on Twitter!

JOIN DIME!!
Subscribe for the latest basketball news and stories emailed to you!
 

DIME TV

Kevin Durant

Nike 3on3
Lakers Nation
Celtics Life
Bouncemag
Bounce Magazine

Blog directory

-->