Comments on: The Knicks Might As Well Spit In David Lee’s Face

By: mike

mike — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:58:38 +0000

i think knicks should sign and trade him to portland for steve blake and travis outlaw. They are great players and would really help our knicks. david lee suckkkss over priced!! drop him off in portland and grab two valuable players. i really like it

By: Sweet English

Sweet English — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:07:26 +0000

Paul we can all look at 82games.com, itn doesn’t make you special.

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:44:54 +0000

His numbers are NOT inflated. It’s just not correct to say so

By: HISTORY LESSON

HISTORY LESSON — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:33:51 +0000

pistons got charlie v and gave him 35 mil for 5 years so go figure and hes a way better talent than david lee

By: Moneybaga

Moneybaga — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:18:26 +0000

@dk
Why don’t you hop off nates dik? Once in a lifetime game changer? Nate is a spectacular player but he is no different from someone like ben gordon. Nate has great offensive ability but he’s nothing more than a scorer, very similar to earl boykins. Once nate’s athleticism starts declining or god forbid he has an injury, his production will start dropping exponentially. I personally don’t even care whether the knicks sign David lee or not, but to say rebounders are easier to find than scoring guards in the NBA is complete bullshit.

By: shawn

shawn — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:09:07 +0000

we all love lee for 2 reasons: double-doubles and sentiment. Defense is NOT ONE of the reasons. he’s a great piece on the right team. The knicks is not the right team this year. maybe in the next year or two, he is the right fit. But right now, he is not worth more than 8 mil per. Donnie walsh has it right and doing the only thing he can do. Pure and simple. The only other option is to match any offer and then TRY to trade him at a good value, which could backfire. Sign and trades are always at risk of not working out. If he signs him for 8 mil MAX, then wouldnt a trade be much easier?

By: ?

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:10:27 +0000

SMH shows how greedy people are you give me 8 million per to be on a team i love playing the sport i love im signing on the dotted line. He is a solid player but he isn’t worth more i would have offered him 6 million per year

By: ?

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:09:27 +0000

SMH shows how greedy people are you give me 8 million per to be on a team i love playing the sport i love im signing on the dotted line

By: nick c

nick c — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:53:36 +0000

cynic u summed it up perfectly. stole what i was about to say. INFLATED numbers with no other real big men in a knicks uniform that were good. yeah harrington but i think of him as a small forward and not a rebounder

By: the cynic

the cynic — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:39:43 +0000

8 mil seems pretty fair to me. Lee isn’t worth more then 8 mil and no team is going to offer him 10 mil. Everyone knows Lee’s numbers are heavily inflated and his game is very limited. David Lee is solid, nothing more nothing less. Do the smart thing Dave and take the money, and try to get the Knicks to tack on an extra year