NBA / Aug 12, 2009 / 4:25 pm

Who’s Better: Steve Nash or Jason Kidd?

Nash vs. Kidd

Nash vs. Kidd

We argue. You decide.

STEVE NASH (by Ben York)
He’s lost a step. He can’t play defense. He’s old. He’s overpaid. He’s a system point guard.

Blah…blah…blah…

The so-called debate on whether Steve Nash can still play effective and consistent basketball is ridiculous and, frankly, irresponsible. Last season, in the most tumultuous and difficult year of his 13 year career, Nash put up numbers that almost bested his first MVP season in ‘04/05.

‘08-09: 15.7 ppg, 9.7 apg, 3.4 tpg, 93.3 FT%, 43.9 3PT%, 50.3 FG%
‘04-05: 15.5 ppg, 11.5 apg, 3.3 tpg, 88.7 FT%, 43.1 3PT%, 50.2 FG%

Those are sick numbers, and he did it with much less options to work with, even from his 2nd MVP season (with Amar’e out) in ‘05-06. The real question here is right now, who is the more effective player — Kidd or Nash? The answer to that, my friends, is obviously Steve Nash.

The Mavs system, with Jason Kidd at the helm, isn’t PG centric or guard focused; the bulk of their points and creativity on offense comes from the wings and Dirk’s ability to play inside-out. I mean, for God’s sake, J.J. Barea could run that team just as good as Kidd has, sometimes better. One way to illustrate how much better Steve Nash is than Jason Kidd, at this point in time, is to hypothesize how the Suns and Mavs would be if Kidd and Nash switched teams. Yes, each team plays a different style and has different personnel, but can you honestly say that if the Mavs had Nash they wouldn’t have a legitimate shot at beating the Lakers? On the flip-side, if the Suns had Kidd, they’d be a bit better defensively but they’d lose out on Nash’s ability to take over games on the offensive end of the floor; having Kidd on the Suns certainly wouldn’t lead to any more wins or make the Suns a better team — Nash on the Mavericks makes them better.

There’s no question that Kidd is still a better defender, but at what point do we give Nash a break? He’s had three of the all-time worst defenders of the pick & roll (Dirk, Amar’e, and Shaq) as “help” for his entire career! Of course, this isn’t to say that Nash is a great defender by any means. Rather, there are just so many other facets to his game (leadership, creativity, shooting, encouragement, support, and work ethic) that he should be let off the hook a bit for his defense.

Back to the question at hand — right now, there shouldn’t be any question who is the better player. From a statistical point of view, it’s not even close. Nash beats Kidd in points, assists, FT%, 3PT%, FG%. How about intangibles? Nash is a clear leader of men by example; he’s the first off the bench to high-five and encourage teammates (even in a blowout), consistently deflects credit, and shoulders the blame when things aren’t going well. In simple terms, Nash personifies the true definition of a leader, and backs it up with his game.

Kidd vs. Nash

Kidd vs. Nash

JASON KIDD (by Austin Burton)
If any two players stood a chance of remixing the SportsCenter-bred basketball fan’s mentality, it was Jason Kidd and Steve Nash. Preceded by Maravich and Magic, succeeded by CP and D-Will, Kidd and Nash were the ground-bound magicians with the ball, the ones who drew “Did you see that sh*t he did?” reactions without touching the rim or taking a shot. And nearing the end of their careers, the debate over who’s better is still out there.

When Nash inked a two-year, $22 million extension with the Suns this summer, there was a sense that it was more of a “Thanks for everything” than a “Take us to the promised land” deal. When Kidd re-upped with Dallas for $27M over three, it was no lifetime achievement trophy. Kidd is still expected to deliver the goods; in large part because he’s better at it right now than Nash, the man he once fought for Best Point Guard in the World status.

Admittedly, the contract thing is pure perception. In judging Kidd vs. Nash, the facts take me back to one game in April. On national TV, the Suns went into Dallas needing a win to stay in the playoff picture. The Mavs were also fighting—there were no giveaways in the West at that point—but it clearly meant more to Phoenix. So all Kidd did was rip Nash apart, dropping 19 points and 20 assists (with two turnovers) in three quarters, orchestrating an offense that scored 140 points and effectively ended Phoenix’s season. It was Kidd’s best all-around effort of the year and a near-flawless display of how to play point guard on an NBA court.

In guiding Dallas to the second round of the playoffs, Kidd averaged 9.0 points, 8.7 dimes, 6.2 boards and 2.0 steals in ’08-09. Nash inevitably scored more and put up more assists in a system that dictates greater numbers, but he can’t match the rebounding, steals and just all-around effectiveness Kidd offers. Steve Nash is an offensive basketball player; Jason Kidd is threat across the board. Kidd had three triple-doubles last year, and two other times he recorded double-digit rebounds and assists but fell short on the scoring part. True, Kidd’s defense is suspect at this point, but it’s still better than Nash’s, whether it’s straight-up D or playing the passing lanes. And while Nash has either tabled or dropped in every area of his game, Kidd is actually getting better in at least one facet: Last season, Kidd hit 40.6% of his threes, the best line of his career, and his 41.6% from the field was his best since 1999.

The PG position has changed since the Magic era — from teams coveting pure playmakers to preferring explosive scorers — and then changed back again. In that time, Kidd and Nash have been both the prototypes and the throwbacks. Except for a year or two along the way, Kidd has always been the better player. With little left but the Hall of Fame in their sights now, he’s still got Nash in his rearview mirror.

Who do you think is better?

Follow Ben York on Twitter: @bjyork
Follow Austin Burton on Twitter: @AustinatDIMEmag
Follow DIME on Twitter: @DIMEMag

“Who’s better?” archives
3/3 — David West vs. LaMarcus Aldridge
2/26 — Kevin Durant vs. Danny Granger
2/19 — Paul Millsap vs. David Lee
2/17 — Caron Butler vs. Tayshaun Prince
12/24 — Marcus Camby vs. Andrew Bynum
12/19 — Deron Williams vs. Chauncey Billups
12/17 — Manu Ginobili vs. Tracy McGrady
12/12 — Amare Stoudemire vs. Al Jefferson
12/10 — Dirk Nowitzki vs. Chris Bosh
12/9 — Derrick Rose vs. O.J. Mayo
12/8 — Rasheed Wallace vs. Elton Brand
12/5 — Kevin Martin vs. Vince Carter
12/4 — Brandon Roy vs. Joe Johnson
12/3 — Dwight Howard vs. Yao Ming
12/2 — Paul Pierce vs. Carmelo Anthony

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • http://dimemag.com Ben York

    @NC – pun intended? ;)

  • K Dizzle

    @ Ian – hell must be freezin over cuz I agree with all your posts(91-93) …except the kobe not bein clutch thing

    @ johnsacrimoni – you’d take Kidd over Rondo, Westbrook, Rose or CP3?

    @ Heaven – Kidd is more clutch than Nash? You A) haven’t seen nearly enough games or B) haven’t seen nearly enough games

  • http://n/a Heaven is a Playground

    k dizzle, I watched more than enough to know what steve nash’s weakness is and that is clutch play. Anyway, here is a 35 year old Kidd giving the 34 year old Nash the business. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEuevmhCkvw&NR=1

  • NC

    @Ben York No doubt no doubt … hahaha!

  • christopher

    steve nash yea baby! hes my favorite b-ball player

  • doc

    Are yall kidding?Nash cant hold Kidds dick.

  • doc

    @K-dizz-Tell Nash to get to a chip before u talk that clutch shit.Kidd took worse teams than Nash had twice.

  • dgatorr

    well, i would say JKidd has many more sides to his game than Nash has ever had. but its funny this story breaks at the same time “Deadspin”, has the article running, telling of the NBA score keepers “cooking” the books on stats, to keep fan interests up.
    well now, imagine that ?

  • appletice

    Jason Kidd this year league leader in clutch steals
    also clutch .500 3pt shooter

  • Cynthia

    You can’t give Steve Nash a “break” because he doesn’t play D just because he scores a lot. Not playing D is Phoenix downfall. Their “leader” ought to be doing EVERYTHING possible for his team to win INCLUDING playing D. Nash has NEVER done that….not in Phoenix or Dallas. And the arguement that if Nash were in Dallas they would “have a legitimate shot at beating the Lakers” is just plain WRONG and clearly the Nash supporter is NOT looking at history. The MAVS and specifically Dirk Nowitzki have played their best basketball WITHOUT Steve Nash. They went to the finals WITHOUT Nash. They won 67 games WITHOUT Nash. And DIRK was the MVP WITHOUT Nash. A great point guard MAKES THE PLAYERS AROUND HIM BETTER. Dirk Nowtizki, with Jason Kidd at the helm had the BEST SEASON of his career last season. He had BIGGER NUMBERS than he had his MVP season. Jason Terry won 6TH MAN OF THE YEAR last season. These guys had help. And that help came in the form of one of the GREATEST POINT GUARDS TO EVER PLAY THE GAME…JASON KIDD.

  • Cynthia

    One other thing…..Nash was part of the downfall of his own team last season. At the beginning of the season Nash “the leader” was ALL for the coaching change. Couldn’t wait to get a coach who thought DEFENSE was the way you win titles. But somewhere during the season, playing D just wasn’t fun anymore. I’m guessing it wasn’t fun because no one (with the exception of Raja Bell plays D on that team….and we all know what they did with Bell, now don’t we?). Nash was one of the vocal leaders who wanted to go back to run and gun. Get rid of the coach. So with all of the players bitching including their fearless leader Nash, Steve Kerr (THE WORST GM in the league imop) bowed to the wishes of the Nash and others and fires the coach. And what happens then? The Suns don’t even make the playoffs. And in the game in Dallas that Phoenix HAD to win, no one…including their “leader” Steve Nash seemed to give a damn. And even if Nash would have had the expertise to actually play D against J-Kidd, would he have had the will??? According to his actions ALL SEASON long the answer is a DEFINITE NO.

  • lb#33

    KIDD! 3rd eye unblind, bigger, stronger, walking triple double.

  • MavsFan

    Wow.. You gotta be kidding me? Jason Kidd? He is the most overrated player of all time. First off, his shooting is fucking awful, just plain terrible. Career 40%, he can’t score and is an offensive liability. His passes are overrated too, Steve Nash sets up layups, Jason Kidd throws passes to Vince Carter. Nash makes plays, Kidd lets someone else do it. Steve Nash is absolutely the best pick and roll player of all time, have you seen the way he reads plays? Responds to traps, to people playing under/over the pick? He kills. No doubt in my mind he would have won a few titles, had joe johnson not been injured, amare not been injured and had Tim Donaghy not been rigging the games. As for defense Nash is underrated. He is one of the best in the game at drawing charges and people need to start pointing this out more. Kidd is really getting slow and gets killed by elite pgs now. His defense is not what it used to be, and frankly its all he has got. This is easy. Nash hands down.

  • K Dizzle

    @ Cynthia – all that and you seem to forget that J Kidd is a 40% career shooter and maybe you missed it, but there was a dude named Amare who missed a chunk of the season, maybe that might help you understand why Phoenix missed the playoffs. Maybe you missed the “improvements” the Mavs made when Nash left so I’ll try to be brief:
    1) Avery takes over for Nelson – defense becomes priority
    2) Josh Howard and Marquis Daniels come into their 2nd years and are much improved
    3) Mavs get rid of Walker(who don’t even pretend to play defense) and Jamison(who you don’t need cuz you already got Dirk at the 4)
    4)Mavs pick up Harris, Terry and Dampier – defense is waaaay better
    Since everybody wanna talk about how much better the Mavs were without Nash and how they rolled to the Finals, please explain what happened in the first round against Golden State.
    And numbers and mvps have nothing to do with each other. Dirk put up better numbers with JKidd than he did in his mvp year. Could that maybe just mean he was a better player hittin his prime in his late 20s and understandin how to get his efficiently? Who you think would draw more attention from the opposition? AN open Nash or an open JKidd? Who leads the league in charges drawn year after year…but he don’t play no defense? Numbers don’t really mean nuthin when it comes to the mvp award cuz Nash’s best personal numbers season was the year he didn’t win the mvp.

    @ Doc
    I love that argument, but the question wasn’t “WHo was the best point guard back damn near TEN YEARS AGO or who got to the Finals twice back in 2001-02? It’s who you think is better now?
    Kidd supporters keep rollin back damn near 6-8 years to make their point. In a poll of nba players and execs, Nash was voted the best shooter IN THE LEAGUE…right now. Only player in history to do the 50-40-90 3 straight seasons. It’s pretty obvious that Kidd and Nash have they troubles slowin down the CP3s, the Parkers, Roses and DWills of the league, but nobody can. I vote Nash cuz at least he can give the buckets back…he ain’t shootin 40%

  • Lebron

    Steve Nash hands down.

    This isn’t even close – 2 time MVP – career stats – better FG %, better FT %, Better 3P %. Took a 29 win team to 62 wins. Makes every player on his team an allstar. JKIDD is good, Nash is great plain and simple.

    Nash when he retires will go down as top 3 all time, period. JKIDD will most likely fall in the tap 7 or so.

    This debate should be about if Nash is the 2nd greatest point guard of all time behind Magic. If Nash or Stockton, not Nash or JKIDD.

  • chief youngblood

    Who really cares

  • /.,';/.,';';/........................ go jazz

    Hmmm good question NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • KH

    The fact that this is even a “debate” is embarrassing. If we’re talking about their career overall or this past decade…we have a good argument. But it seems like we’re talking about recent years and the present. CLEARLY…Kidd is a shell of his former self. Nash has essentially been just as good as he was in his MVP years minus the first half of last year…when he was still much better than what J-Kidd is now. The one thing Kidd had a big advantage on was his defense…which is very mediocre now…probably better than Nash’s still, but they’re both getting burned by quicker guards like Paul, Rondo and Williams…but I mean…who isn’t? And Nash isn’t even the liability on D that everyone makes him out to be. He’s no stopper but he’s a smart help defender and excellent at drawing charges.

    I seriously can’t believe this Austin guy is trying to make a case for Dallas version of Kidd as being better than Nash. Also someone commented about Nash in a reply saying something along the lines of “shooting isn’t what you necessarily need out of your PG”…um erroneous. Rebounding isn’t something you necessarily need out of your PG…it’s a nice bonus but shooting is infinitely more important for a guard.

    The entire case Austin makes for Kidd is weak…the perception of their contract…really? If you polled GMs, coaches, and players on who they would rather have right now…it would be nearly unanimous in Nash’s favor. If forced to admit the truth…most of the people involved in Dallas’s organization would admit it. And then he brings up one game and then goes on to praise Kidd’s “all around effectiveness” and being a “threat across the board”…please. Again, Kidd is no longer the Jason Kidd of earlier this decade. Nash is still very good and a top 5 PG in the league. Kidd might not even be top 10 anymore. Don’t get me wrong…he’s still a solid PG…but come on…seriously? His last points talk about Nash’s numbers dropping off and one facet of Kidd’s going up. He conveniently ignores that Nash’s numbers shot up in the 2nd half of the season and commends Kidd for shooting 41.6% from the field (which is very below average) and 40 percent from downtown…which is respectable but if you actually watched the games…it’s because teams WANTED Kidd to take those shots. They left him wide open so they could focus on guarding ACTUAL offensive threats on the Mavs team. So basically being left wide open to take jumpers he shot 40 percent on 3s and still a pretty mediocre 41.6 overall.

    Nash is one of the best shooters in the game…superior 3pt shooting, FG% and FT%. Kidd lags FAR behind in this aspect. And in the most important aspect of being a PG…more assists. More assists in any way you want to look at it…per game average, per 36 minutes, total assists.

    You can also look at Hollinger’s PER…and while this isn’t a tell all kind of thing…still this also points to Nash being superior right now. Nash finished 6th amongst PGs…Kidd finished a distant, distant 16th. The legendary Eddie House didn’t finish too far behind Kidd in this regard. Kidd’s game has been in decline since his last couple years with the Nets. He’s just been getting by on reputation now. He had no business starting on the Redeem Team at the Beijing Olympics but only did so because of his career accomplishments.

    Nash is better than Kidd RIGHT NOW…plain and simple. If you’re a rational person, you can clearly see Nash is the superior player. We’re talking about 2009 and not 2002 or 2003.

    And I can’t wait for this year to play out to further prove that Nash > Kidd.

    For real…this reply was only so long because it’s so LUDICROUS that someone is trying to make a case for Kidd as better right now…and that there are a bunch of replies that agree with him. Completely and utterly ridiculous.

  • KH

    I’d also like to add that the MVPs Nash won were legit…I’m not gonna bother going into explaining that but I will say that while yeah a case definitely could have been made for others as the MVP that year…Nash definitely also had a strong case so really…I have no problems with those 2 MVPs. You want to talk about a media bias? I feel like voters didn’t give him a 3rd MVP in the 07-08 season because they didn’t want his name amongst the greatest players. And while obviously Nash isn’t nearly as good as those players…that’s irrelevant…they played in different eras and circumstances. Him winning a 3rd MVP wouldn’t justify him being as good. And the MVP is a regular season award…so it doesn’t mean much that he hasn’t gone to a Finals. If you want to talk about an MVP’s failure in the playoffs, let’s criticize Dirk instead. And Nash has gotten to the Western Conf. Finals a couple of times…sorry if in the year he had his best shot he lost to the greatest PF of all time in Tim Duncan (someone Kidd lost to as well) and it didn’t help that Amare and Diaw were suspended for a game. Really don’t think that can be held against Nash in this argument as Kidd came out of a MUCH weaker Eastern Conference.

  • KH

    and the last thing i have to say is this austin character contradicts himself…

    http://dimemag.com/2008/09/the-15-best-players-in-the-nba/

  • Real

    Nash by a landslide

  • Ninja

    Um…

    People trashing one or the other is a bit silly.

    Both are great Point Guards. Going by thier career Kidd obviously did more.

    Go watch the 2002 playoffs and tell me he wasn’t clutch.Especially the Pacers series. He was up against one of the best clutch shooters of all time and played an hour, after hurting a hamstring and taking some hard hits.

    He didn’t give up, or even show a sign of weakness. Instead he steals the ball from a 6’11 forward, and dives to grab it, before being landed on by the forward. This was in the second overtime iirc.

    That’s huge for anybody, let alone a point guard that was playing on a team who’s second/third best player was a rookie. He scored 30 points, 9 assist, and I think 9 rebounds that game.

    Then he went to the finals, and despite getting swept, he himself put up a good fight. No point guard is going to be able to stop a dominate center. At the best they can try to outscore him. They didn’t have anybody capable of stopping shaq. Adding Kobe and a great team of lakers and you can’t expect Kidd, a rookie, and K-Mart to stop them.

    Nash is a great player, but you have to remember his team is built more or less around making shots. Not ANY point guard could run it, but I’m sure Kidd could handle it rather well.

    As others have said, Nash runs a good offense well, Kidd makes a good offense and throws in a few rebounds and steals a game.

  • ryan

    Dude Nash by far.. he has 2 mvps.. Kidd cant shoot for shit. Nash all the way baby

  • jayson

    none of you understand basketball.. look i have been a suns season ticket holder since 1996.. I have seen the kidd era and the nash era.. Nash is better by far..Dont get me wrong kidd was good.. now you guys cant believe Nash won back 2 back mvps but if you actually watch every suns game you will find out why in 2003- 2004 the suns were awful.. we had talent but couldnt close.. nash turned us into a 62 win team.. thats mvp.. so nash over kidd

  • cj

    Jason Kidd is the better point guard than Steve Nash because he’s 2nd all time in assists,6th all time in steals and 2nd all time in triple doubles. He’s led his team to the playoffs for 13 straight years(Nash didn’t make it last year)and has more 3′s in his career.Also has more years leading assists in nba, more allstars, defensive teams, 2 gold medals.And two finals appearances. Even though he was in a weak conference, the Nets went from almost last in eastern conference to eastern conference champions, by just one man.He definitley should have won the MVP for that instead of Duncan.And finally, even with him being 36 turning 37 next month, he shows no sign of slowing down. He’s 5th in assists this year and 2nd in rebounds among guards. So KIDD IS BETTER THAN NASH ALL TIME!!!!!!!

  • cj

    Jason Kidd is the better point guard than Steve Nash because he’s 2nd all time in assists,6th all time in steals and 2nd all time in triple doubles. He’s led his team to the playoffs for 13 straight years(Nash didn’t make it last year)and has more 3′s in his career.Also has more years leading assists in nba, more allstars, defensive teams, 2 gold medals.And two finals appearances. Even though he was in a weak conference, the Nets went from almost last in eastern conference to eastern conference champions, by just one man.He definitley should have won the MVP for that instead of Duncan.And finally, even with him being 36 turning 37 next month, he shows no sign of slowing down. He’s 5th in assists this year and 2nd in rebounds among guards. So KIDD IS BETTER THAN NASH ALL TIME!!!!!!!

  • temps

    nash cause hes nash

  • erik

    kidd sucks…..media swings on his nuts for no reason…if nowinski scores 30 and kidd scores 4, the headlines will read ‘dirk and kidd combine for 34′…its sickening…..out of 8 assists (2 per quarter) half will be a chest pass to a waiting shooter…if he makes the shotr, kidd gets the assist wow!!!! shit you bring the ball up 50 times a game, you should have assists when you cant shoot for shit, yeah get it in someone elses hands. most of his boards are from the long bounces off the rim from the brick he puts up.

  • Viel Mervic

    No brainer. It’s Jason Kidd, plain and simple. Nash got two MVP awards because he was damn good for THAT 2 SEASONS ONLY, while Kidd was the best point guard for a decade. Yes, Nash shoots way way better than Kidd, and probably passes/dishes a lot better than Kidd NOWADAYS, but points and assists aren’t the only category in the playbook. What about steals? Rebounds? and OMG, TRIPLE DOUBLE?! Kidd is hands down the better point guard. 2nd all-time in Assists, 2nd all-time in Triple Double, 2nd all-time in Triple-Doubles in Playoffs, 4th all-time in Steals, 5-time Assists Leader, 5-time All-NBA First Team, 9-time All-Star. You say Nash won two back-to-back MVPs, ok, fine. That probably worths a lot of points. And Kidd hasn’t got one (thanks to the blind NBA panelists for choosing Tim Duncan over him in the 2002 season). Well, has Nash ever lead his team to the finals TWICE, BACK-TO-BACK? If you’re asking about who’s better, then that means the guy should be better ALL AROUND, which incidentally, JASON KIDD is.

-->