Comments on: All systems go for Celtics/Cavs; Portland picks its point guard

By: specialguydurr!

specialguydurr! — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:45:56 +0000

@chicagorilla-sorry about that beatdown the blazers gave you last year, I guess you guys are still feelin’ that one.

By: Chicagorilla

Chicagorilla — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:59:46 +0000

although Blake did get Robinson back once. Nate got him twice. in the same game.

By: Chicagorilla

Chicagorilla — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:51:38 +0000

Does it matter, Blake and Miller both have been clowned by Nate Robinson or Derrick Rose to the point of embarassment. I bet Nasty Nate and his jungle of love can’t wait til he faces Blake and Miller, two of the slowest PG’s in the L.

By: Taj

Taj — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:53:09 +0000

LOL at the Braylon/Kwame comment…

By: Dean

Dean — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:18:11 +0000

Very sad to hear about Kevin Widemond!!
RIP

By: Dean

Dean — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:14:42 +0000

Also, I was saying on here about Blake/Miller.
It’s not who starts, it’s whom that finishes or is in there when it matters most.

Steve Blake will be in there.

By: Dean

Dean — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:13:11 +0000

I KNEW BLAKE WOULD BE THE STARTER!!!
He’s better overall than Miller. He can hit the 3, he can dish. He’s a better team player, he’s more into his teammates than Miller.

A PG CANNOT BE A LONER!

By: DoctorGrey

DoctorGrey — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:06:20 +0000

Andre Miller is waaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy better than Steve Blake. But being 2nd stringer isn’t so bad. Being a starter never really guarantees the number of minutes you’ll be playing… or who would end the game…or if you’re just going to start for the next few minutes and relinquish the position the rest of the game.

I guess it’s all about the pride thing, of being called a starter. Just about Egos.

(I was really really hoping Andre Miller becomes the starter…now I’m just praying he gets to play more minutes than Blake even if he’s a 2nd stringer…for Fantasy purposes.)

By: Pet Society Help

Pet Society Help — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:31:53 +0000

Corey Maggette #1 on the NBA’s underachiever list

By: specialguydurr!

specialguydurr! — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:25:32 +0000

@KCL- the Blazers won 54 games last year, but I agree with some of the people saying Andre is gonna bring this team down. He has only had 3 weeks to run plays, and get to know the team. I think in the long run his style of play will be better for the team, but if he comes off the bench for awhile, so what? He’s finally on a winning team, which will probably mean more to him in the long run, than his personal stats do. If not, then this team doesn’t need him.