NBA / Dec 21, 2009 / 3:00 pm

Who’s Better: Aaron Brooks or Rodney Stuckey?

Aaron Brooks

We argue. You decide.

AARON BROOKS (by Jack Jensen)
How many people do you think were ready to throw in the towel after the Rockets traded away Rafer Alston last February in favor of their second-year point guard out of Oregon? I’m guessing more people than care to admit it jumped off the bandwagon and thought Aaron Brooks wasn’t ready to lead Houston anywhere. He’s too small, too inexperienced and not ready for what’s expected of a starter.

After his national breakout party in the 2009 playoffs, and in leading the Rockets to a surprising 16 wins already this season, it’s safe to say that Houston made the right decision. Despite what my man Aron Phillips says about Luis Scola, his teammate, Brooks, is everything that I love about the NBA. He has built himself up from college disappointment as a junior, to become one of the most exciting guards to watch in the League today.

I have been in AB’s corner from his gloomy days in Eugene to dancing in the Elite Eight his senior year to giving Kobe and the Lakers all they could handle through seven games in last year’s second round. In all my time watching Brooks, the attribute that I like most about him is his relentlessness to never surrender. No matter if it’s against a better defender, a broken play or in garbage time, the man will try and bust your teeth in on every possession. There isn’t a quicker guard in the Association than Brooks, and his game feeds off of his speed and agility. In comparing him with another member of the Pacific Northwest family, Rodney Stuckey, it’s all too easy to get stat-envy.

Stuckey averages more points, steals and minutes than Brooks, but surrenders in the only stat that matters: wins. As the starting PG, Brooks has shown he can get it done in both the playoffs and the regular season. Brooks led the Rockets with 16.8 points, 3.4 dimes and seven wins in the ’09 postseason. As the starter for his team, Stuckey’s Pistons went four-and-out against Cleveland. As of Monday, the Rockets are 16-11, while Detroit is 11-16.

In this battle of Seattle, Brooks has solidified himself as the more valuable player. Without Brooks, the Rockets would not have convincingly beaten Portland in the first round last year, much less even sniffed out seven games with L.A. This season, Houston would be reduced to a stockpile of role players putting up Charlotte Bobcats-like results. Brooks sets the tempo and his orchestration of the offense is key to the Rockets’ success. Both Detroit and Houston are dealing with injuries, but each still has sufficient talent surrounding their point guards.

Drafted 11 spots ahead of Brooks in ’07, Stuckey has also found his comfort level in the League this year, but doesn’t have full command over his team. The Pistons are still Rip‘s team, they’re still Billups‘ old team. I know Stuck’s the gleaming future of the Motor City, but it still just doesn’t quite feel like Rodney’s team yet. Brooks has taken a squad — seemingly destined to be fishing for Lotto pong come June — that lost Ron Artest and Yao last summer, and has the organization thinking playoffs again. He is also leading Houston in scoring and assists (17.5, 5.5). No question these two guys have a long future ahead of them, but right now, I’m sticking with Brooks.

Rodney Stuckey

RODNEY STUCKEY (by Austin Burton)
Joe Dumars earned two NBA rings playing next to an ice-cold omniscient veteran point guard in Isiah Thomas. As a front-office dealmaker, he picked up a third ring after signing an ice-cold omniscient vet PG in Chauncey Billups. So what makes Dumars up and trade Billups to clear space for some small-school young’un named Rodney Stuckey?

Go to YouTube and enter “Joe Dumars mix” and you’ll begin to understand. Natural as it is to compare Stuckey to the great Pistons point guards preceding him, a closer look reveals the third-year pro is more likely the second coming of Joe D on the floor.

Stuckey isn’t just a point guard. (Advantage #1 over Aaron Brooks: Versatility.) Injuries to Rip Hamilton and Ben Gordon this season have resulted in Stuckey playing a lot of two-guard while still initiating Detroit’s offense – the same role Dwyane Wade plays in Miami and Brandon Roy plays in Portland. (Advantage #2: Carrying greater responsibilities with equal or greater individual success.) Like Dumars, a reluctant and struggling three-point shooter his first six years in the League, Stuckey has room to develop the weakest facet of his game. In the meantime, like Dumars, Stuckey has the playmaking and scoring ability of a true dual threat in the backcourt.

At 6-5, 205, Stuckey can strong-arm his defender or dart past him, his superb body control allowing him to absorb contact and make tough shots. (Advantage #3: More impressive physical specimen.) While Brooks represents the bad end of a mismatch with bigger point guards, Stuckey matches up evenly with any guard in the League. None are too tall for him, none too quick, none too strong. Where he might fall short is simply experience, and in that regard, Stuckey and Brooks are about even.

Or, consider all Stuck’s been through in his nascent career: Key contributor on an Eastern Conference Finals squad as a rookie; unexpectedly thrust into a starting role following the Billups trade; enduring the drama involving Allen Iverson‘s PT and Detroit’s internal issues; and now on his third head coach in three years. And all Stuckey has done is reach the cusp of franchise-player status for one of the NBA’s signature franchises, displaying a vet’s poise all along. (Advantage #4: Experience.)

Stuckey averages 19.7 points, 4.4 rebounds, 4.4 assists, 1.4 steals and 2.9 turnovers, and is hitting 85 percent at the line – topping Brooks in five of those six categories. (Advantage #5: Numbers.) Stuckey has been held below double figures in scoring only once, compared to five times for Brooks. (Advantage #6: Consistency.)

True, Brooks has guided Houston to a better record with just as many injuries to deal with. But consider the degree of difficulty: While Brooks has Rick Adelman on his side, Stuckey has a rookie head coach in John Kuester. And while the slight-of-frame Brooks is limited to defending and being defended by opposing point guards, Stuckey routinely lines up across from the best perimeter defenders and scorers. Against the Lakers on Sunday, Stuckey split time between Kobe and Artest. When L.A. plays Houston, Brooks draws Derek Fisher and Jordan Farmar. (Advantage #7: Tougher competition.)

Aaron Brooks is my guy. We grew up in the same Little League system and share an alma mater. I went to school with his older brother for years. I root for Aaron every game he plays. But Aaron grew up playing with Rodney Stuckey. He knows his game. And I believe he’d even understand why, in this instance, the advantages fall in Rodney’s favor.

Who do you think is better?

Follow Jack Jensen on Twitter: @jensenjack
Follow Austin Burton on Twitter: @AustinatDIMEmag
Follow DIME on Twitter: @DIMEMag

“Who’s better?” archives
12.16 — Michael Beasley vs. Luis Scola
12.10 — Gilbert Arenas vs. Monta Ellis
12.8 — Jason Terry vs. Manu Ginobili
12.2 — Gerald Wallace vs. Josh Smith
11.30 — Brandon Jennings vs. Derrick Rose
9.25 — Tim Hardaway vs. Kevin Johnson
9.22 — Hedo Turkoglu vs. Rashard Lewis
9.15 — Reggie Miller vs. Clyde Drexler
9.2 — Chris Paul vs. Tony Parker
8.27 — Grant Hill vs. Trevor Ariza
8.25 — Baron Davis vs. Mike Bibby
8.21 — Shaquille O’Neal vs. Pau Gasol
8.19 — Andre Iguodala vs. Rudy Gay
8.14 — Ray Allen vs. Michael Redd
8.12 — Steve Nash vs. Jason Kidd
3.3 — David West vs. LaMarcus Aldridge
2.26 — Kevin Durant vs. Danny Granger
2.19 — Paul Millsap vs. David Lee
2.17 — Caron Butler vs. Tayshaun Prince
12.24.08 — Marcus Camby vs. Andrew Bynum
12.19.08 — Deron Williams vs. Chauncey Billups
12.17.08 — Manu Ginobili vs. Tracy McGrady
12.12.08 — Amare Stoudemire vs. Al Jefferson
12.10.08 — Dirk Nowitzki vs. Chris Bosh
12.9.08 — Derrick Rose vs. O.J. Mayo
12.8.08 — Rasheed Wallace vs. Elton Brand
12.5.08 — Kevin Martin vs. Vince Carter
12.4.08 — Brandon Roy vs. Joe Johnson
12.3.08 — Dwight Howard vs. Yao Ming
12.2.08 — Paul Pierce vs. Carmelo Anthony

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Steve A

    True Story about Brooks: He had a kid with his g/f at the end of his JR year at UO, and debated quitting the team and moving back to Washington to get a job to support his new family. Keep in mind, at this time Brooks was a huge bust and the prospects of him playing in the NBA were ZERO. Good thing he stuck with it! Million dollar(s) decision!!!

  • http://heckler@aol.com Heckler

    damn that.
    both decent, neither are anything spectacular.

    bring on the tyreke evans & brandon jennings debate!

  • http://twitter.com/TomGyorko TomGfromCanada

    Stuckey is better in the end

  • the cynic

    for me, Brooks all day. The Rockets are probably the most enjoyable team to watch play basketball in the nba and Brooks is part of that reason. I really hope the Rockets can integrate a healthy McGrady into the line-up by the end of the season and do some damage in the post season……

    just not against the lakers

  • Reddi Red

    stuck! all day.

  • bigdoggchad

    Noah vs. Bierdrins
    Al Harrington vs. Odom
    Landry vs. Kevin Love
    Okur vs. Bargnani
    Birdmam vs. Louis Amundson
    Al Horford vs. Kendrick Perkins

  • bigdoggchad

    Birdman not Birdmam.

  • bigdoggchad

    one more jet vs. jamal crawford

  • andthefoul

    2 different players, hard to compare.

    Bottom line stucks a scoring guard in this league. The problem is hes not all that gifted of a ball player. Physically gifted yes, skill wise no. Already 1 of the best slashers in this league just doesnt have the creativity to finish well or dump it off. He will make imo a good 2nd or 3rd option sg on a winning team or a great 6th or 7th man that can play pg/sg/sf for small stretches.

    Brooks on the other hand actually is more comparable to billups and dumars unlike this site suggests stuckey is(*not saying brooks is or will be as good as them). He’s a natural game manager that picks his spots when to score. Above avg shooter. Doesnt have the physical tools of stuckey, but doesnt need it. His bbIQ makes up for it. He doesnt have elite lvl quickness or skill either so his ceiling is top 5-15 pg in this league.

    Who’s better? All depends on what you need. Brooks is more of a sure thing so I go with him. Will say this though. If stuckey turns out to half the mental make up of dumars he should be a damn lethal ball player. Hes got the tools, just everything else is missing.

  • http://www.dimemag.com Jack J


    good thoughts, but did you say Brooks does not have elite level quickness?

    I can’t think of anyone quicker in the League – Monta is close

  • http://www.mediate.com Jim M

    They are both great players. The difference I see is that Brooks is key on nearly every play for the Rox . . . he breaks down the defense even if he is 2 or 3 passes removed from the ultimate scoring shooter. Brooks (and Lowry) are the engines that make the Rox go. I really like Stuck, but he does not define games in the way that Brooks does.

  • http://twitter.com/PoppiGEE POPPI GEE

    Dang as much as I love the Rockets I gotta go with Stuckey based on the debates.


    Still AB is that dude though and I think in time AB will be the better.

    They bout even though.

  • Colton

    im from eastern washington, so most would assume i have a bias to pick stuckey over brooks. i dont. both great ball players. ive seen both play and i think brooks edges him out.
    side note:
    i had a friend who he tried to get with when he was in college and i told her, you better swoop him up, your gonna be a millionaire

    bottom line is:
    girls dont listen or true love is more important than money.

    still cant decide. haha,

  • Andrej

    im goin with aaron brooks i dident think the rockets would be as good as they are

  • http://lifeondumars.com/ Ryan

    Right now Brooks is “better”, but Stuckey has much more potential because he’s never really had a distinct role on a talented team yet.

  • gregory

    I’d take Brooks, if you mean who is a better point guard. Both look for their shot a lot and don’t blow away with their passing skills but of the two, Brooks is less selfish and that’s saying a lot because he can dribble the air of the ball like the best of them. Stuckey is not even a point anymore. He’s an attacking 2 through and through. When he has the ball, it’s all about attacking or shooting from 19 feet. I’m not saying he’s a bad player–he’s actually been very effective lately because he’s making more of his shots–but if I had to pick one for a point guard vacancy, it’d be Brooks.

    Stuckey’s the player Courtney Lee thought he was when he got traded from Orlando and talked about himself like he was an all star in waiting. Both have the listed height to be a NBA two, going about 6’5 each but arms that are about 5 inches shorter than the average wing player make them seem undersized.

  • karizmatic

    Right now I have to go with Aaron Brooks, I used to be very high on Stuckey a year or two ago, but in my opinion he hasn’t really evolved as a team leader that you want at the point. If the Pistons move him over to the two guard he may actually be able to grow better in that position, maybe him and Will Bynum are the Pistons backcourt of the future, but if it’s about point guards, I have to go with Aaron Brooks.

  • http://www.petsocietyhelp.com Pet Society Help

    Rodney Stuckey since bigger guards would have an advantage over aaron come crunch time.

  • LEX

    Can y’all do Gasol vs Nowitzki? Battle of the foreigners