Blake Griffin Vs. Kevin Durant: Who Would You Rather Have on Your Team?

Last night in the Thunder’s division-clinching win over the Clippers, we got to see the future of the NBA go head-to-head. There was the smooth-shooting Kevin Durant, dropping 29 points with an assortment of floaters and pull-ups. He’s on his way to another scoring title and more than likely, at least one playoff series win with a team that has everyone bug-eyed frightened. Then on the other side, there was Blake Griffin, scoring 35 and dunking on everything, a human wrecking ball, literally the only reason that the Clippers have become relevant again. When was the last time a player on a Lottery team became the face of a regular season?

Throughout the year, as Griffin has disassembled everyone in his path, this argument has gained steam: has he become the best young player in the game? Just a year after that title was locked away in Durant’s locker, it has emerged once again.

Some time ago, it was all about LeBron James, Dwight Howard and Dwyane Wade. Now, as they have graduated beyond, they have bequeathed the next line of great, young cornerstones: players like Durant and Griffin and Derrick Rose (and I still believe John Wall will get there too).

For now, since they battled in a wonderfully entertaining game last night, let’s stick to Griffin and Durant. Seriously, no two players could be more different, yet more similar. They both play with an inner anger that never seems to boil over, but are still polar opposites when it comes to how they slice teams up. It’s Subway versus D’Angelos. McDonalds and Burger King. How do you want it?

Continue reading

You’ve heard the comparison before. Now you decide. Right now, which guy would you rather have on your team for the next decade-plus?

2010-11 Numbers:
Kevin Durant: 27.8 ppg, 6.9 rpg, 2.8 apg, 1.1 spg, 1.0 bpg, 2.7 topg, 46% fg, 88% ft
Blake Griffin: 22.5 ppg, 12.2 rpg, 3.7 apg, 0.7 spg, 0.5 bpg, 2.7 topg, 51% fg, 65% ft

Going strictly off those numbers, I’m assuming most are going to jump for the rookie (even though Durant’s PER is higher – 23.6 to 21.9, his true-shooting percentage is higher – 59% to 55% and his win share number is better – 11.5 to 9.5). But here’s something to think about: KD’s game is built to last. There’s no guarantee with Griffin, but Durant is almost undoubtedly going to be battling for the scoring title for the next dozen years.

Griffin will probably (hopefully) stay healthy, but there’s no guarantee with the way he recklessly throws his body around. And Griffin will probably develop more of his game beyond the athleticism, but that’s not an absolute either. Yet at the same time, he seriously could already be the second-best big man in the entire world.

Either way, it’s the proverbial line-in-the-sand. Two players representing two opposite ends of the hoop spectrum.

Which side are you on for the next 10-15 years?

Follow Sean on Twitter at @SEANesweeney.

Follow Dime on Twitter at @DimeMag.

Become a fan of Dime Magazine on Facebook HERE.

×