Latest News, NBA / Sep 23, 2011 / 12:00 pm

Unacceptable Blackness: The NBA Lockout As A White-Collar Race War

Allen Iverson

Allen Iverson (photo. Gary Land)

Under the rules of the new Collective Bargaining Agreement that NBA owners want, players will receive less money over shorter contracts thanks to a hard salary cap, as well as a smaller percentage of the overall revenue pot.

Less money means less power, and less power means less entitlement for players to make the decisions that dictate the league’s future. Again, the racial demographics involved in this scenario cannot be overlooked.

Now here is where a lot of people will call BS. “NBA players are given millions of dollars to play basketball,” they’ll say. “Now you’re calling the league racist? Really?

These are many of the same people, mind you, who use terms like “post-racial” and claim racism is dead because Barack Obama was elected President of the United States. And to the segment of America’s Black population still living under the omnipresent uncertainty of what White people will let us get away with, that thinking makes sense: If they let Obama be president, if they let Oprah be a saint, if they let O.J. get off (until Vegas), then letting NBA players make so much money means it can’t be a racism issue.

But I’m not saying this is racism. I’m not saying David Stern is the devil or that James Dolan hates Black people or that Clay Bennett is part of the Klan.

Stern is the one caught in the middle here, the guy trying to appease his employers (the owners) while maintaining authority over his subordinates (the players). Dolan and Bennett and every other White owner in the league (even Dan Gilbert) surely appreciate the contributions of Black players and employees to boosting their personal fortunes. I’m sure some of their best friends are Black.

I’m not saying it’s simple racism. I’m saying it’s a racial issue. There’s a difference.

The NBA has been teetering on the edge of being unacceptably too Black for years. There was Allen Iverson, and then Ron Artest, and then Kwame Brown and his band of high schoolers. The mostly-White owners frowned upon it and the mostly-White media bitched about it, but as far as threats go, the braids and brawls were blue-collar problems. Those were easily fixable with a few updated policies governing clothes, age and aggressive behavior.

The NBA lockout is the manifestation of a white-collar problem. Under the old CBA, the likes of LeBron and Chris Paul and Dwight Howard and Carmelo Anthony could have essentially run the league, because they’d finally realized they had the talent and the power and the money to do so.

The owners need some of that power back, to restore the balance to which they were accustomed. They need to be able to cut players loose from big contracts at a moment’s notice like they do in the NFL — the league whose practices were referred to as modern-day slavery by multiple players during its recent lockout.

The NBA owners need to be able to keep their players in check.

Otherwise, the alternative would be an uprising of billion-dollar proportions. Call it a power struggle. Call it a white-collar race war. Call it the unthinkable fantasy of the Jack Johnsons and Curt Floods of eras past.

Just don’t call it strictly business.

Follow Austin on Twitter at @AustinBurton206.

Follow Dime on Twitter at @DimeMag.

Become a fan of Dime Magazine on Facebook HERE.

Pages : 1 2 3
Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • dlight

    @50 yes unless the give up their perks too!

    I have not read Dime in awhile, off an on since AB left to my surprise he dropped this well written piece. Chicagorilla on point! If racism didn’t exist we wouldn’t be in an Depression by definition, media is controlled by those who want consumers to keep spending regardless if they have it to spend. Those who caused this economic mess were slapped on the wrist and are back in power, look them up. If the tea party was black the would have a bounty on their heads.

  • http://deleted dagwaller

    dlight – Economic depression is CAUSED by racism, “by definition”? Ok…please go back to not visiting the site.

  • http://www.wtf.com Chicagorilla

    @2cents

    If that were true (NBA owners weren’t making money) then you and the supporters of the owners have a point. But that is not true. Check this article by a writer at SLAM (no disrespect @DIME lol)
    http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/lockout-2011/2011/09/oh-these-poor-billionaire-owners/
    The wrtier points out the coorelation between the NBA owners and the complaining billionaires across the country. It also proves the most of the owners are LYING or BENDING THE TRUTH about their profits from the NBA.

    The one thing i will not do is believe a billionaire when they are complaining about money. Its not easy to form an opinion on something like this, because you have both sides coming at you with numbers some true, but most of them cooked. But after being in the US military where they pretty much give it to you head on, and now working as a civillian, where they pretty much screw you every chance they get. I believe none of what i hear and half of what i see.

    unrelated side note: I just saw that Bill Gates and his wife has pledged to give away 90% of their earnings. 90%!!!!!! of their earnings! that is amazing.

  • 2 cents

    Hey @chicagorilla – really appreciate your well thought out posts, but I think the one thing missing here is looking at the billionaires in context. So what if they are worth billions, this is money they have earned OUTSIDE of the NBA.

    They own the franchise and they are the “boss”, so to speak. If you have a gripe about the owners crying poor, then look at the fact that their company (read: NBA franchise) is making a loss. If this is true, then why should they continue running it?

    The model is simply broken and this is not a class nor a race issue, this is a business. And isn’t that what all the players always end their sentences with when they make a decision as to which team they will sign with?????

  • http://www.wtf.com Chicagorilla

    @2cents

    I guess what im saying is, I don’t believe the Owners are not making money. I have a hard time believing that if they were losing money, these guys who made Billions by being smart as hell or putting people around them who are smart as hell, they would keep pumping money into something that is producing profits.

    Understand that many of the owners bought their teams for a very low amount years ago. The teams have since increased their value by say…300%. During that time, the owners didn’t always share those profits with the players (see Scottie Pippen and why he left the Bulls).

    I don’t think the owners should be doing some sort of charity and giving away all their earnings. I understand they should recieve a profit and i believe they do. The issue is that they want MORE of a profit than they are already getting because they see other companies doing the same thing.

    Take CISCO for instance. They lay off thousands of employees to increase profits. They weren’t going broke, they just wanted more money to spend on hookers and yatchs.

    Here is a quote from the article i posted from the writer at slam that i believe sums it up.

    “The rich have gone from being grateful for what they have to pushing for everything they can get. They have mastered the arts of whining and predation, without regard to logic or shame. In the end, this is the lesson of the NBA lockout.” – Dave Zinn of Slam Magazine

  • http://deleted dagwaller

    The rich, both in America and abroad, are the problem.

  • 2 cents

    #55 and #56 – if the rich are the problem, then are you also pointing the fingers at the rich players? MJ is a billionaire and LBJ is well on his way. If you are going to say the rich are the problem, then look no further than the players demanding more and more, hence the reason teams are not making as much profit.

    @Chicagorilla. If you are going to point out owners who bought the teams for very little years ago, then also consider the salaries the players had years ago. The owners didn’t also have all the expenses that go with a modern NBA team (like first class travel, 5 star restaurants, player gyms, perks, etc).

    I hate corporate greed as much as the next person, but the NBPA is just as greedy as the owners. Difference is that the owners OWN the team, the players THINK they own the team.

  • http://deleted dagwaller

    @2cents – you’re not wrong

-->