NBA / Sep 15, 2011 / 12:00 pm

Who’s Better: Steve Nash Or Bob Cousy?

Steve Nash

Steve Nash

Just ask Bob Cousy to see his championship rings and this question may answer itself. In a tremendous 14-year career that spanned from the late 1950s to the dominant Celtics of the 1960s, Cousy won six championships alongside 12 (Heinsohn, Russell, K.C. Jones, Sam Jones, Ramsey, Sharman, Macauley, Havlicek, Lovellette, Risen, Andy Phillip and Houbregs) other Hall of Famers and created a long standing legacy.

In the time since he retired, the NBA has seen some amazing point guards take control of the game, mastering it with wizardry and elegance. One of the best since then – not often mentioned in these conversations – is Steve Nash.

Nash started his career as the backup to 1990s star Kevin Johnson and all-time great Jason Kidd with the Phoenix Suns and then made his way out of that crowded backcourt to the Dallas Mavericks and then back to the Suns. With Dallas, Nash became synonymous with great shooting and high scoring offensive teams. His wings really spread once back in Phoenix where Nash became synonymous with double-doubles and All-NBA Team honors.

This is the third entry in the Point Guard Debate that saw Kidd overcome Gary Payton and Isiah Thomas upset John Stockton using these four basic categories: Statistics, Best Season, Playoff Success and Historical Effect. Let the debate begin!

***

STATISTICS
Across the board these two are similar and have a few minor differences. Cousy was definitly a better rebounder and does not have certain statistics (steals, turnovers, double and triple-doubles) due to the time he played. He was a better scorer, but only because of circumstance. With Boston, he had a player named Bill Russell who did the little things that allowed him to score in more volume. The team structure allowed Cousy to be more of a scorer at times and a distributor at other times, quite the luxury.

Nash & Cousy stats

Look up and down the rosters Nash played with. He may have played with one surefire Hall of Famer and two or three fringe Hall prospects. Nash had to be the catalyst that drove the team all game and all season. He pushed the tempo, scored as needed and spread the ball around to numerous cellar dwellers that became household names thanks to his creativity.

As an all-around player, Cousy has the edge in stats, but Nash more than makes up for it as an elite passer and shooter.

Push

BEST SEASON
Steve Nash: 2005-2006 (54-28)… 18.8 PPG, 10.5 APG, 4.2 RPG, .8 SPG, 51.2 FG%, 43.9 3PT%, 92.1 FT%, 43 Double-Doubles and 0 Triple-Doubles
Bob Cousy: 1958-1959 (52-20)… 20 PPG, 8.6 APG, 5.5 RPG, N/A SPG, 38.4 FG%, N/A 3PT%, 85.5 FT%, *double-doubles and triple-doubles were not recorded this season

The second of Nash’s back-to-back MVP seasons ended in similar fashion, a six-game loss to the Dallas Mavericks in the Western Conference Finals. This was a season after winning his first MVP and reaching the WCF the year before, which means he and the team were on the map and had expectations. Nash did not shy away from the moment, leading the Suns once again to the brink of greatness only to be denied by another Texas team.

Two years after winning his only MVP, Cousy had an elite season that led to Boston winning the first of EIGHT championships in a row. He was the catalyst for the nightly dominance Boston was able to display by filling up the stat sheet in virtually every category.

At their best, Nash was more of a pure shooter and distributed the ball with unmatched control and Cousy was a scorer that could do everything very well. Both players exhibited those qualities flawlessly in these seasons and took their team to hieghts many never get to see. Nash fell short and Cousy won, but look back at the rosters and count the Hall of Famers for each team.

Push

Pages : 1 2
Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • http://www.glidehoyas.blogspot.com Kent

    Both were true point guards and there really shouldn’t be any comparison. Just my opinion :0)

  • ctkennedy

    who in the hell seen Bob Cousy play ….that wont a good comparison …players 30-40yrs apart aint gon work …Lls

  • jm

    Yeah you can’t compare these two vastly different era’s stats. In a game that is so much more athletic now, would Cousy average 5 boards a game?? Of course not.

    But, if I had the same exact squad and needed to choose one of these 2 players…I’d ride with Nash.

  • Promoman

    Steve Nash is a better player but it’s not a fair comparison. Bob Cousy was one of the most influential players to ever play but he can’t hang with Nash.

  • exRaptorfan

    3/4′s of the people who read this mag or go to this site dont even know who Bob Cousy is so this article isnt ERA friendly. Unless youre a diehard ball fan. Nash wins for his ERA. Cousy does for his. No comparison. True points but the game has evolved too much to put in the same category.

  • http://dimemag.com panchitooo

    LOL@statistics say that exRaptorfan most likely does not know who Bob Cousy is